Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

COVID-19 Pandemic Updates

EN 1201 - College Writing II (Lutz)

Finding Research

Research Paper: Belief

Research Paper (Part 1, The Introduction):

Introduction: When I was in the 6th grade, I was taught about the great explorers of the 14th, 15th, 16th, and 17th Centuries. Magellan. Hudson. Drake. Polo. Columbus. I distinctly remember imagining myself on deck of Drake’s ship, The Golden Hind, circumnavigating the globe, pursuing high adventure through unknown, undrawn lands. These great men uncovered the dark parts of the globe. It wasn’t until college, until I read books like Lies My Teacher Told Me and The People’s History of the United States that I realized I had been lied to, viscously and repeatedly—though I expect unknowingly. Somewhere in the vast cultural milieu of my schooling I felt I had been promised that learning meant trusting my teachers. I believed my teachers. I think I must have foolishly and naively believed in a hierarchy of fallibility with myself at the bottom and my teachers at the pinnacle, closest to an error-free life. Two things never occurred to me: (1) the great men and women of the past were human, flawed, greedy, and occasionally downright evil. And, (2) my teachers, too, were human, flawed, embarrassed, and occasionally misinformed. This would become a recurring theme. Lightning, it seems, will not give you superpowers. Wishing hard for something doesn’t make it come true, and thinking of someone before the phone rings doesn’t mean I have psychic powers or that I’m mystically connected to my friends. Did I believe these voodoo dreams at one point? Maybe. Maybe I still hold to the belief that a certain incantation to my wife will protect her from harm when she’s away from home. And maybe I find comfort in this. Belief, in short, is a powerful thing. It creates religions and cults, presidents and jokes. My hope for you and this paper is a chance to explore a belief, recent or distant, and ask some of the questions. Ask, as Julia Kristeva does in her book, why we have This Incredible Need to Believe? And ask how it came about. But, belief is only one facet of the polyhedral process of this paper. In order for us to discuss belief, we need to discuss its cousins, neighbors, antecedents and tangents. In other words we need to explore the truth, lies, bullshit, fake news, bad science, bad research, misunderstanding, misinformation, and why we should care. I hope that the reading material for the semester will prepare you for this. I hope you will engage in this reading material and doubt it, test it, challenge it—challenge me and my claims and arguments. Your paper should investigate a lie or a belief or an instance(s) of bullshit, weigh its consequences, uncover its causes, un-pack its power to persuade. Your paper should be meticulously researched, logically argued and elegantly presented.

Research Paper (Part 2, The Assignment):

The Assignment: Write a 7-8 page research paper on either (1) why people believe what they believe. You should feel free to define belief as broadly as you’d like. However, you may not write about one of your own beliefs. Choose some-thing you can be skeptical about, whether it’s crypto-zoological, spiritual, religious, political, conspiratorial or historical. Then, with sympathetic research, ask yourself why so many people believe in your topic. The reasons for this belief may vary from psychological to neurological to educational. Or, perhaps, an amalgamation of all three. Perhaps more. Whatever the case, you must engage in an argument relevant to today that answer how and why people believe(d) what they believe. A simple illumination of a belief system, a report on Scientology for example, does not constitute a good research paper. You must instead, explore all of the reasons why someone might be induced to believe. Finally, you must be able to construct a logical, entertaining and compelling demonstration of your points. Even the brightest truth is tarnished by poor construction. Alternatively, write about (2) a lie, an in-stance of bullshit or fake news. If you choose this path, be certain that you can demonstrate beyond doubt that the topic is a lie or is bullshit (following Frankfurt’s definitions of the term) or is fake news. Ask the question why does this matter and to whom? Then, be certain you are answering both in your paper. Conduct empathic research and wrestle with the effects of this claim. Caution! If you can’t absolutely prove the falsity of the claim, don’t write about it. If you’re writing about bullshit, recall that truth and lies are less important than intention in this instance and write about why we should care about his. Remember, good research paper exists to make an argument that matters to the population today.

Research Paper (Part 3, Methodology & Process):

Methodology: Your introduction should be enticing and clear. Perhaps most importantly, it should introduce your topic and your argument. While your thesis does not have to be explicit, it should begin its development in your introduction. That said, your introduction need not be artificial or adhere to any inorganic structural rules, but it should orient your audience. It should provide the purpose, highlight your voice and style, and its themes might reasonably recur throughout the essay. The body should spill naturally out of the introduction. The majority of your evidence will be collected in the body in the form of paraphrasing, summarizing and integrated quotations along with the necessary accumulated data, anecdotes, etc. This evidence should be intelligently introduced and more importantly, thoroughly analyzed and explained. Use They Say, I Say as a guide for the proper way to manage an academic argument. An A paper will have mapped out a structure and an organization for the body. Idea will flow into idea in an effortless and intuitive manner. Because the evidence is organized, your transitions should be nearly trans-parent—practically unneeded. Your conclusion, then, should be neither abrupt nor repetitive. Rely on the construction of the essays we read in class to guide you.

Process: Before you turn your final draft in, you will complete a series of minor tasks including proposals, annotations, summaries and analyses. Each of these should help you on your journey to research your paper.

One final thought: as this is a paper on lies & bullshit, try to avoid adding to the surplus. Research well the claims you make. Test your logic. And, finally and most significantly, don’t make up what you don’t know for certain.

What Should I Use?

When considering where you will do your research, it is important to remember what kinds of sources will be serve your needs.

  Advantages Disadvantages


Image result for webpage

  • Concise
  • Most current information
  • Government publications
  • Biased, wrong, or outdated
  • Most quality information not freely searchable on the web


Image result for article

  • Current
  • Peer-review process
  • Accuracy and relevance check
  • Not best for general overviews
  • May not include current information


Image result for book

  • Background/overview information
  • Authoritative information
  • Context with other issues
  • 3-5 years minimum to publish
  • Not best for current topics

Do you need to learn the basics about a vector-borne disease?

Do you need to know what is going on at the UN related to water issues?

Do you want details on a specific low cost filtration system?

Identifying Peer-Reviewed Literature

Scientific / Peer-Reviewed Checklist

  Did the author(s) of the article do the actual research?
  Can you find a statement about when the article was accepted for publication?
  Is there a sizable list of references?
  Do the authors assume you are familiar with their topic?
  Is it challenging to read?

If you have answered "yes" to these five questions you have probably located a scientific article.

Formatting your Bibliography

MLA Style Citation Examples

In-Text Citations

NOTE: MLA treats quotations and paraphrasing the same. 

(Last name Page)


(Dorris and Erdrich 23)

More than two authors

(Last name et al. Page)


(Burdick et al. 42)

Journal Articles

 Last name, First name. "Article Title." Journal Title, vol., no. if available, year, pages. Database, if available. Stable URL, if available. 


 Borroff, Marie. "Sound Symbolism as Drama in the Poetry of Robert Frost." PMLA, vol. 107, no. 1, Jan. 1992, pp. 131-44. JSTOR,

Journal article with multiple authors

When a source has more than two authors, include Last name, First name, et al.

 Last name, First name, and First name Last name. "Article Title." Journal Title, vol., no. if available, year, pages. Database, if available. Stable URL, if available. 


 Dorris, Michael, and Louise Erdich. "The Crown of Columbus." PMLA, vol. 120, no. 3, May 1997, pp. 182-44. JSTOR,


Last name, first name. Book Title. Publisher, abbreviated as appropriate, year. 


Borroff, Marie. Language and the Poet: Verbal Artistry in Frost, Stevens, and Moore. U of Chicago P, 1979.

Book with multiple authors

When a source has three or more authors, reverse the first name and follow it with a comma and et al.

Last name, first name, et al. Book Title. Publisher, abbreviated as appropriate, year. 


Burdick, Anne, et al. Digital Humanities, MIT P, 2012. 

Chapter in edited book

 Last name, first name. "Chapter Title." Book Title, edited by Editor, Publisher, abbreviated as appropriate, year, pp. pages. 


 Bazin, Patrick. "Toward Metareading." The Future of the Book, edited by Geoffry Nunberg, U of California P, 1996, pp. 153-68.

Newspaper Articles

 Last name, First name. “Article Title.” Newspaper Title, First name Last name of any other contributors, Version, Numbers, Date of publication, Location.


Tumola, Cristabelle. “NYC Developers Seek to Justify High Prices with New Amenities.” Metro [New York City], 9 Aug. 2016, p. 4.


Sometimes, websites do not clearly state who wrote the information on the page. When no author is listed, omit the author information from the citation. Start the citation with the title.

 Last name, First name. “Article or Page Title.” Website Title, Name of the publisher, Date of publication, URL.


 White, Lori. “The Newest Fad in People Helping People: Little Free Pantries.” Upworthy, Cloud Tiger Media, 3 Aug. 2016,

Annotated Bibliography


An annotated bibliography is a list of citations. What makes it different from a Works Cited or standard Bibliography is that each citation is followed followed by 1-2 paragraphs which inform the reader about the source. You should reflect on how you plan to incorporate a source into your paper. 

1. The citation

In MLA format. Arranged alphabetically by author's last name.

2. The summary

Provide a brief overview detailing what your article or book is about. You can discuss the authority of the author, the intended audience, or how this fits into the literature in that field.

3. The analysis

Explain why this article or book is important to your argument. Show how it supports and/or refutes your argument. You might also discuss its limitations or biases. Be as specific as possible.

Is the example you need missing?

Contact the Library at to request a new example and citation help!

Setting up RefWorks


RefWorks is a new way to collect, manage, and organize research.  You can read, annotate, organize, and cite your research as well as collaborate by sharing collections.

From simple bibliographies to papers formatted with in-text citations or footnotes, RefWorks handles it all. ​To learn more about RefWorks, use our RefWorks research guide.

To create a RefWorks account:

  1. Go to the link below and click Create account
  2. Fill in your information, making sure to use your DelVal email address.  
  3. Go to your inbox and click the email link to complete the activation process. 

Already have an account? Just go to the link below and click "Log In"

Online Tutorials

RefWorks screencasts are available 24/7 on ProQuest's YouTube Channel. 

Click here to begin watching.

Getting Help

Access Services Librarian